This
one is required reading. In this
“reverse spot zoning” decision, the Third DCA held that the Village could not
deny a rezoning to a residential district that was consistent with the zoning
of the surrounding lands, on the grounds that one of the permitted uses in the
new district was a school use that the City knew the owner would request and
that the neighbors objected to. The
opinion cites some of the more recent “reverse spot zoning” opinions in the
Third DCA, but also the following two key and undercited opinions regarding the
valid and proper use of zoning: Porpoise
Point P’ship v. St. Johns County, 470 So.2d 850 (Fla. 5th DCA
1985) and Debes v. City of Key West, 690 So.3d 700 (Fla. 3d DCA
1997).
Sunday, May 17, 2015
Desire to Use Property for a Permitted Use not Valid Reason to Deny Rezoning - Palmer Trinity Private School, Inc. v. Village of Palmetto Bay, 31 So.3d 260 (Fla. 3d DA 2010)
Labels:
zoning
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment